परीक्षा और आंतरिक आकलन


विश्वविद्यालय परीक्षाएं

इनमें प्रत्येक सेमेस्टर के अंत में विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा आयोजित सिद्धांत और व्यावहारिक परीक्षाएं शामिल हैं। कुल मूल्यांकन में इनका 75% वजन है। ये परीक्षाएं विश्वविद्यालय द्वारा घोषित कार्यक्रमों के अनुसार आयोजित की जाती हैं।

सिद्धांत परीक्षा: सिद्धांत परीक्षा के मामले में, विभिन्न कॉलेजों से तैयार शिक्षकों का एक पैनल कई सेट प्रश्न पत्र तैयार करता है। विश्वविद्यालय की परीक्षा शाखा परीक्षा आयोजित करने के लिए एक यादृच्छिक रूप से चयनित सेट का उपयोग करती है। प्रधानाचार्य द्वारा नियुक्त परीक्षाओं के उप अधीक्षकों की देखरेख में कॉलेज में सिद्धांत परीक्षाएं आयोजित की जाती हैं जो परीक्षा के अधीक्षक के रूप में कार्य करती हैं। विश्वविद्यालय परीक्षा द्वारा निर्धारित केंद्रीकृत परीक्षा केंद्र में विभिन्न कॉलेजों से तैयार शिक्षकों के एक पैनल द्वारा सिद्धांत परीक्षाओं की उत्तर स्क्रिप्ट का मूल्यांकन किया जाता है।

व्यावहारिक परीक्षाएं: व्यावहारिक परीक्षाओं के लिए प्रश्न पत्र विश्वविद्यालय के संबंधित विभागों द्वारा नियुक्त बाहरी और आंतरिक परीक्षकों की टीमों द्वारा तैयार किए जाते हैं। उसी दिन एक ही दिन में छात्रों द्वारा इन परीक्षाओं के पूरा होने के तुरंत बाद छात्रों का प्रदर्शन मूल्यांकन किया जाता है और मार्क सूचियां विश्वविद्यालय को भेजी जाती हैं।

आंतरिक मूल्यांकन


कुल अंक में इसका वजन 25% है। कक्षा 25 उपस्थिति के आधार पर इस 25% का 5% असाइन किया गया है। शेष में से, 10% कक्षा परीक्षण और असाइनमेंट के आधार पर दिया जाता है और शेष 10% परियोजनाओं, असाइनमेंट और अन्य शिक्षण-शिक्षण गतिविधियों के आधार पर दिया जाता है। गतिविधियों, जिन्हें आंतरिक मूल्यांकन अंकों का आकलन करने के लिए शामिल किया जाएगा, संबंधित शिक्षक के विवेक के लिए छोड़ दिए जाते हैं।

विश्वविद्यालय की परीक्षा संबंधित शिकायत निवारण तंत्र

विश्वविद्यालय की परीक्षा का डीन मूल्यांकन से संबंधित शिकायतों को प्राप्त करता है और संबोधित करता है। डीन का कार्यालय ईमेल dean_exam@admin.du.ac.in और टेलीफ़ोन नंबर 011-155215 के माध्यम से सुलभ है। इसके अलावा, छात्रों को उनके उत्तर स्क्रिप्ट की एक फोटोकॉपी प्राप्त करने का अधिकार है और इसके आधार पर उपचार मांगना है। छात्र नाममात्र शुल्क के भुगतान पर उत्तर स्क्रिप्ट के पुनर्मूल्यांकन के लिए भी अनुरोध कर सकते हैं।

आंतरिक आकलन संबंधित शिकायतों को हल करने के लिए तंत्र


छात्रों को उनकी शिकायतों की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए निम्नलिखित अवसर हैं:

  • कक्षा परीक्षण / परियोजनाओं के परिणाम प्राप्त करने के बाद, आदि। छात्र किसी भी आंतरिक मूल्यांकन से संबंधित गतिविधि के परिणाम प्राप्त करने के तुरंत बाद अपने वर्ग के शिक्षकों से संपर्क कर सकते हैं और उनकी शिकायतों की रिपोर्ट कर सकते हैं।

  • शिक्षकों द्वारा दिए गए फॉर्मेटिव फीडबैक के समय: शिक्षक आमतौर पर कक्षाओं या ट्यूटोरियल के दौरान छात्रों को फॉर्मेटिव फीडबैक प्रदान करते हैं, जब छात्र अपनी शिकायतों की रिपोर्ट करते हैं।

  • शिक्षकों द्वारा आईए अंकों के अंतिम रूप के समय: छात्रों को उनके आईए अंकों पर हस्ताक्षर करने के लिए भी बनाया जाता है। यह न केवल उन्हें अपने आईए अंकों के बारे में जागरूक करता है बल्कि उन्हें अपनी शिकायतों की रिपोर्ट करने का अवसर भी देता है।

  • नोटिस बोर्ड / वेबसाइट में आईए अंक प्रदर्शित होने के बाद: छात्रों को शिकायतों की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए समय दिया जाता है, यदि कोई हो और विश्वविद्यालय कंप्यूटर सिस्टम पर इन अंकों को अपलोड करने से पहले सुधार की मांग की जाए।

  • प्रत्येक कॉलेज विभाग आईए अंकों की जांच करने और उनकी शुद्धता और निष्पक्षता सुनिश्चित करने के लिए एक संयम समिति की स्थापना करता है। इस समिति द्वारा सभी शिकायतों को भी संबोधित किया जाता है। अनसुलझा शिकायतों को कर्मचारी परिषद के सचिव को भी बढ़ाया जा सकता है, जो आंतरिक मूल्यांकन प्रक्रिया या प्रिंसिपल की देखरेख करता है।

दिल्ली विश्वविद्यालय के निम्नलिखित अध्यादेश परीक्षाओं को नियंत्रित करने वाले नियमों को परिभाषित करते हैं:

Ordinance X-A: Disorderly Conduct and Use of Unfair Means in Examination

  1. For the purposes of this Ordinance -

    1. Examination means an examination conducted by the University of Delhi;

    2. The year means the academic year;

    3. Candidate includes an examinee taking any examination in a particular year and, wherever the context so permits, every student on the rolls of the University or of a recognized College or Institution;

    4. The use of dishonest or unfair means in the examination includes:

      1. assisting in any manner whatsoever any other candidate in answering the question paper during the course of the examination;

      2. taking assistance from any other candidate or any other person or from any book, paper, notes or other materialin answering the question paper during the course of the examination;

      3. carrying into the examination room any book, paper, notes, or other material whatsoever likely to be used directly or indirectly by the andidate in connection with the examination;

      4. smuggling in an answer book or a continuation sheet;

      5. taking out or arranging to send out an answer book or its any page or a continuation sheet:

      6. replacing or getting replaced an answer book or its any page or ontinuation sheet during or after the examination;

      7. getting impersonated by any person in examination.

      8. deliberately disclosing one’s identity or making any distinctive mark in the answer book for that purpose;

      9. communicating with or talking to any other candidate or unauthorised person in or around the examination room during the course of the examination;

      10. communicating or attempting to communicate directly Or through a relative,guardian and friend with an examiner with the object of influencing him in the award of marks;

    5. Disorderly conduct in the examination includes:

      1. misbehaviour in connection with the examination, with the superintendent, the Invigilator on duty or the other staff working at the Examination Centre, or with any other candidate, in or around the examination centre, before, during or after the examination hour;

      2. leaving the examination room before the expiry of half an hour or without handing over the answer book to the Invigilator-in-charge or without signing the attendance sheet;

      3. intentionally tearing off the answer book or a part thereof or a continuation sheet;

      4. disturbing or disrupting the examination;

      5. inciting others to leave the examination room or to disturb or disrupt the examination;

      6. carrying into the examination centre any weapon of offence.

  2. No candidate shall make use of any dishonest or unfair means or indulge in disorderly conduct in the examination.

  3. A candidate found guilty of the use of dishonest or unfair means or disorderly conduct in the examination may be disqualified from passing the examination for which he was a candidate, and may, in addition, be debarred from appearing at any future examination of the University for a further period to be stated or be expelled from the University and declared not a fit and proper person to be admitted to any further examination of the University.

  4.  

    1. Any candidate who, in the opinion of the Invigilator on duty or the Examiner conducting a practical or oral examination or the Superintendent of the Examination Centre contravenes or is suspected of contravening the provisions of clause 2 in the examination room, shall be forthwith challenged by such Invigilator, Examiner or Superintendent who shall ask for a signed statement from the candidate. The candidate may be subjected to a search of his person to recover any incriminating material from him by the examination staff on duty.

    2. Without prejudice to the provision contained in sub-clause (a) above the Superintendent of an Examination Centre or the Examiner conducting practical or oral examination shall also have the power to expel a candidate who in his opinion, has contravened the provisions of clause 2, from the examination centre for the remaining duration of the paper.

  5.  

    1. The Superintendent of the Examination Centre or the Examiner or any Officer of the University, as the case may be, shall report in writing to the Controller of Examinations the case of every student who has contravened the provision of clause 2.

    2. The reporting authority shall give full facts of the case in his report and forward with it the statements. if any, made on the occasion by the candidate and the Invigilator on duty and papers, books and other material recovered from the candidate, if any.

  6. There shall be one or more Examination Disciplinary Committees. Each such Committee, hereinafter referred to as the Examination Disciplinary Committee shall be constituted as under :

    1. On the recommendation of the Vice-Chancellor the Executive Council shall, at the beginning of each year, draw up a panel of teachers of the University to be nominated on the Examination Disciplinary Committee.

    2. Each Examination Disciplinary Committee shall comprise of two teachers to be nominated by the Vice-Chancellor from amongst the panel, one of them being of the status of at least a Reader.

    3. The Controller of Examinations or any person authorized by him, of the rank of not less than an Assistant Controller of Examinations, will function as non-member Secretary of The Examination Disciplinary Committee.

  7. The Vice-Chancellor shall determine from time to time the number of Examination Disciplinary Committees.

  8.  

    1. The Controller of Examinations or any person authorised by him in this behalf shall communicate to the candidate, in respect of whom a report has been received pursuant to clause 5(a). the precise nature of allegations against him and shall require him to furnish his written explanation within a stipulated period.

    2. On receipt of the explanation from the candidate or on the expiry of the period stipulated for submitting explanation if no explanation is received from him the Vice-Chancellor shall assign his case for consideration to the Examination Disciplinary Committee and, where there are more Committees than one, such Examination Disciplinary Committee as he may deem fit.

  9. After considering all the material on record including the explanation, if any, submitted by the candidate, the Examination Disciplinary Committee if satisfied that the candidate is guilty of the use of dishonest or unfair means or disorderly conduct in the examination, shall recommend to the Executive Council the punishment that may be imposed on the candidate under clause 3 according to the nature of the offence.

  10. The Executive Council may, after considering the report, of the Examination Disciplinary Committee take such action against the candidate under clause 3 as it may deem fit.

  11. A candidate on whom any punishment has been imposed under clause 3 may, within 30 days from the date of the receipt of the communication in that behalf, make a representation to the Vice- Chancellor for review of his case and the Vice-Chancellor, if satisfied that the case is fit for reconsideration, refer the same to the Executive Council. The Executive Council may thereupon review the case and pass such orders as it may consider fit.

  12. In the case of a candidate who has been expelled from the University in terms of provisions of Clause 3, the Executive Council may,on the recommendation of the Vice-Chancellor, on the expiry of three years after such expulsion including the examination in connection with which he was punished, exempt a candidate from further operation of the punishment awarded.

  13. If within four months of the publication of the results, it is brought to the notice of the Controller of Examinations that a candidate was guilty of the use of dishonest or unfair means at the examination in respect of which his result was declared, the provisions of this Ordinance shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case of such a candidate provided that before imposing any penalty including the penalty of cancellation of his result, he shall be given another opportunity, to show cause against the proposed punishment and his explaination, if any, shall be the Executive Council.

13. A A candidate against whom an enquiry is pending about his allegedly having resorted to the use of dishonest or unfair means or disorderly conduct in the examination or against whom action is initiated under the provisions of the preceding clause shall, if he takes or has taken any subsequent examination, be deemed to have been only provisionally admitted to that subsequent examination. That examination will stand cancelled and his result thereof would not be declared if on account of the punishment imposed on him as a result of the said enquiry or action, he would not have been entitled to take that examination but for his provisional admission thereto.

  1. If a person, not otherwise covered by these provisions, is found guilty of having impersonated a candidate or of having written, outside the examination hall, an answer book or its any page or a continuation sheet which he knows or has reason to believe will be smuggled into the examination hall for the benefit of any candidate, or of having managed otherwise to replace the answer book or its any page of the candidate after the examination, he shall be disqualified from appearing in any University examination for a period to be stated. The provisions of this Ordinance relating to the manner of imposition of penalty shall, in so far as they may be applicable, apply to the case of .such a person.

Ordinance X-B: Withholding conferment of any Degree/Diploma or Award of any Certificate

Notwithstanding anything contained in Ordinance X-A or in any other Ordinance, the Executive Council may, on the recommendation of the Vice-Chancellor, by a resolution passed with the concurrence of not less than two thirds of the members voting, withhold for such period as they may deem fit, conferment of any Degree/Diploma or Award of any Certificate to any successful candidate at an examination of the University, for reasons, which, in their opinion, justify such withholding e.g., unruly or disorderly conduct, or violence on the campus or in a College, or conviction for an offence involving violence or moral turpitude.